↓ Skip to main content

「国立国会図書館デジタルコレクション」におけるデジタル情報の長期保存の仕組みについて

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of The Society of Photographic Science and Technology of Japan, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 120)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
「国立国会図書館デジタルコレクション」におけるデジタル情報の長期保存の仕組みについて
Published in
Journal of The Society of Photographic Science and Technology of Japan, March 2018
DOI 10.11454/photogrst.80.35
Authors

木目沢 司

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,267,105
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Society of Photographic Science and Technology of Japan
#8
of 120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,859
of 344,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Society of Photographic Science and Technology of Japan
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them