↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular causes of sudden unexpected death in children and adolescents (0–17 years)

Overview of attention for article published in Netherlands Heart Journal, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiovascular causes of sudden unexpected death in children and adolescents (0–17 years)
Published in
Netherlands Heart Journal, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12471-018-1152-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Vos, A. C. van der Wal, A. H. Teeuw, J. Bras, A. Vink, P. G. J. Nikkels, Dutch NODO group

Abstract

Little is known about the causes of unexpected death in minors (0-17 years). In young adults an important cause is cardiovascular disease, with primary arrhythmogenic disorders, atherosclerotic events, cardiomyopathies and myocarditis as main contributors. The aim of this autopsy study was to determine the contribution of cardiovascular disease to unexpected death in minors. In the Netherlands, systematic investigation of all cases of unexplained death in minors was compulsory in a nationwide governmental project during a 15-month period. Autopsies were performed according to a standardised protocol (autopsy rate 85%). A cardiovascular cause of death was found in 13/56 cases (23%). In the group <1 year, the main cardiovascular causes were various congenital defects (n = 3) and myocarditis (n = 2). In the 1-9 year group, no cardiovascular causes were found. In the 10-14 year group, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 1) and ruptured ascending aortic aneurysm (n = 1) were among the observed cardiovascular causes. In 14/56 (25%) cases autopsy revealed no structural abnormalities that could explain the sudden death, mostly in the group <1 year. This national cohort with a high autopsy rate reveals a high incidence (23%) of cardiovascular diseases as the pathological substrate of sudden unexpected death in children. Another high percentage of minors (25%) showed no structural abnormalities, with the possibility of a genetic arrhythmia. These findings underline the importance of systematic autopsy in sudden death in minors, with implications for cardiogenetic screening of relatives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Other 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 11 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2018.
All research outputs
#18,349,015
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Netherlands Heart Journal
#367
of 527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,657
of 336,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Netherlands Heart Journal
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.