↓ Skip to main content

Alternative and complementary therapies for vulvovaginal candidiasis

Overview of attention for article published in Folia Microbiologica, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 765)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alternative and complementary therapies for vulvovaginal candidiasis
Published in
Folia Microbiologica, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12223-018-0652-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thais Chimati Felix, Denise Von Dolinger de Brito Röder, Reginaldo dos Santos Pedroso

Abstract

When it comes to women's health, treating vaginal infections makes up a high proportion of the gynecological services. Among the forms of vaginitis, vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is considered the second most common. Demand for new treatment alternatives is increasingly relevant, especially for therapies with fewer side effects, better tolerability, and lower cost, while still offering improved quality of life in terms of disease prevention. This study intended to investigate the alternative therapies described for the adjuvant treatment of vulvovaginitis caused by Candida species, including alternative and complementary treatment methods used by women. This literature review is based on articles written in English and Portuguese in the PubMed, Google Scholar, and SciELO databases. This study was conducted for the most part using the Brazilian Government's Capes Periodicals Portal, which directs to Google Scholar and PubMed. Since the 1980s, there has been growing interest in alternative therapies in Brazil, a trend which also began in other Western countries in the second half of the twentieth century. Some alternative treatments include substances with antifungal activity, some substances help restore the balance of the vaginal microbiota, while others have an inhibitory activity on microbial virulence factors. The proper use of therapeutic alternatives can effectively contribute to the treatment of VVC, but it should be remembered that some chemical products, such as boric acid or vinegar, and even natural products such as propolis, garlic, and tea tree may have undesirable side effects, having not been tested by well-designed clinical studies. Even so, alternative therapies in the treatment of VVC do have support in the scientific literature.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 145 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Student > Master 21 14%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 8 6%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 57 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 7%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 68 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,265,865
of 23,849,241 outputs
Outputs from Folia Microbiologica
#4
of 765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,392
of 345,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Microbiologica
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,241 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 765 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.