You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethics and Institutional Conflict of Interest: The Research Confidentiality Controversy at Simon Fraser University
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sociological Practice: A Journal of Clinical and Applied Sociology, December 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1026589415488 |
| Authors |
John Lowman, Ted Palys |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 43% |
| Other | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
| Researcher | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 5 | 71% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2015.
All research outputs
#6,753,240
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Sociological Practice: A Journal of Clinical and Applied Sociology
#22
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,851
of 114,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociological Practice: A Journal of Clinical and Applied Sociology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them