↓ Skip to main content

Computational Reproducibility in Archaeological Research: Basic Principles and a Case Study of Their Implementation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 360)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
33 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computational Reproducibility in Archaeological Research: Basic Principles and a Case Study of Their Implementation
Published in
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10816-015-9272-9
Authors

Ben Marwick

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 151 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 25%
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 41 26%
Social Sciences 32 20%
Computer Science 15 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Environmental Science 8 5%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 30 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#560,048
of 25,165,468 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#15
of 360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,920
of 405,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,165,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them