↓ Skip to main content

A multicenter randomized controlled trial of a 3-L/kg/min versus 2-L/kg/min high-flow nasal cannula flow rate in young infants with severe viral bronchiolitis (TRAMONTANE 2)

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
49 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A multicenter randomized controlled trial of a 3-L/kg/min versus 2-L/kg/min high-flow nasal cannula flow rate in young infants with severe viral bronchiolitis (TRAMONTANE 2)
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00134-018-5343-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christophe Milési, Anne-Florence Pierre, Anna Deho, Robin Pouyau, Jean-Michel Liet, Camille Guillot, Anne-Sophie Guilbert, Jérôme Rambaud, Astrid Millet, Mickael Afanetti, Julie Guichoux, Mathieu Genuini, Thierry Mansir, Jean Bergounioux, Fabrice Michel, Marie-Odile Marcoux, Julien Baleine, Sabine Durand, Philippe Durand, Stéphane Dauger, Etienne Javouhey, Stéphane Leteurtre, Olivier Brissaud, Sylvain Renolleau, Aurélie Portefaix, Aymeric Douillard, Gilles Cambonie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 188 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 21 11%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 8%
Researcher 12 6%
Other 42 22%
Unknown 63 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Engineering 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Unspecified 2 1%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 69 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,086,641
of 25,709,917 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,017
of 5,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,267
of 362,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#20
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,709,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.