↓ Skip to main content

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Provoked by Etanercept: Report of 443 Possible Cases Combined from an IBD Referral Center and the FDA

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Provoked by Etanercept: Report of 443 Possible Cases Combined from an IBD Referral Center and the FDA
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10620-015-4007-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aoibhlinn O’Toole, Matthew Lucci, Joshua Korzenik

Abstract

Anti-TNF therapies have revolutionized the treatment of autoimmune inflammatory conditions. Paradoxical treatment with these agents is associated with the development of de novo autoimmune diseases. Less well recognized is the provocation of de novo IBD by these agents. Etanercept is not effective for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and may be more often reported with the development of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. This study assessed the association of new onset IBD in patients with receiving etanercept. The Brigham and Women's (BWH) patient database and the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System were searched for cases of IBD reported with etanercept. A total of 443 cases were identified: 5 pts at BWH (3 CD, 2 UC) and 438 (294 CD, 144 UC) reported to the FDA. Data which were most complete were pooled from 49 patients. NSAID use was reported in 43 % and combination with methotrexate in 29 %. Etanercept was discontinued in 34 pts and 19 required treatment with a different anti-TNF agent. Eight patients had resolution of GI symptoms on discontinuation of etanercept. Therapy was continued in three patients in response to 5-ASA therapy. Development of IBD should be suspected in patients receiving etanercept who develop GI symptoms. This phenomenon appears more commonly associated with initiation of CD. The clinical phenotype appears indistinguishable from usual patterns of IBD. Unlike other autoimmune phenomenon associated with anti-TNF therapy, IBD often does not resolve when the agent is discontinued. This tentative association requires further investigation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 14%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 20 27%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 48%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 15 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2016.
All research outputs
#21,358,731
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#3,790
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#339,779
of 399,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#39
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.