You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Volume Kinetics for Infusion Fluids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Anesthesiology, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1097/aln.0b013e3181dcd88f |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert G. Hahn, David S. Warner |
| Abstract |
Volume kinetics is a method used for analyzing and simulating the distribution and elimination of infusion fluids. Approximately 50 studies describe the disposition of 0.9% saline, acetated and lactated Ringer's solution, based on repeated measurements of the hemoglobin concentration and (sometimes) the urinary excretion. The slow distribution to the peripheral compartment results in a 50-75% larger plasma dilution during an infusion of crystalloid fluid than would be expected if distribution had been immediate. A drop in the arterial pressure during induction of anesthesia reduces the rate of distribution even further. The renal clearance of the infused fluid during surgery is only 10-20% when compared with that in conscious volunteers. Some of this temporary decrease can be attributed to the anesthesia and probably also to preoperative psychologic stress or dehydration. Crystalloid fluid might be allocated to "nonfunctional" fluid spaces in which it is unavailable for excretion. This amounts to approximately 20-25% during minor (thyroid) surgery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 3 | 27% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 9% |
| Colombia | 1 | 9% |
| Poland | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 226 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 37 | 15% |
| Researcher | 36 | 15% |
| Other | 35 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 62 | 26% |
| Unknown | 30 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 168 | 70% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Unknown | 39 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,697,817
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology
#1,696
of 6,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,407
of 103,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology
#8
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.