↓ Skip to main content

Self-Expanding Metal Stents Versus Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy in Anastomotic Leak Treatment After Oncologic Gastroesophageal Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Self-Expanding Metal Stents Versus Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy in Anastomotic Leak Treatment After Oncologic Gastroesophageal Surgery
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11605-018-4000-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felix Berlth, Marc Bludau, Patrick Sven Plum, Till Herbold, Hildegard Christ, Hakan Alakus, Robert Kleinert, Christiane Josephine Bruns, Arnulf Heinrich Hölscher, Seung-Hun Chon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 12%
Other 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 24 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 57%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Unknown 27 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,882,997
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#524
of 2,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,932
of 363,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#14
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.