↓ Skip to main content

What and how are we sharing? A systematic review of the sharing paradigm and practices

Overview of attention for article published in Sustainability Science, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What and how are we sharing? A systematic review of the sharing paradigm and practices
Published in
Sustainability Science, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11625-018-0638-2
Authors

Hyeonju Ryu, Mrittika Basu, Osamu Saito

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 129 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 22%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 32 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 30 23%
Environmental Science 16 12%
Social Sciences 15 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 33 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2018.
All research outputs
#14,428,642
of 23,109,468 outputs
Outputs from Sustainability Science
#660
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,303
of 349,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainability Science
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,109,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.