↓ Skip to main content

Identification of Zika virus vectors and implications for control

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Infectious Diseases, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
84 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
394 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of Zika virus vectors and implications for control
Published in
Lancet Infectious Diseases, February 2016
DOI 10.1016/s1473-3099(16)00073-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Constância F J Ayres

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 394 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 8 2%
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 371 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 76 19%
Student > Master 58 15%
Student > Bachelor 55 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 7%
Other 86 22%
Unknown 41 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 73 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 53 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 4%
Other 73 19%
Unknown 51 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2018.
All research outputs
#595,431
of 26,106,015 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#952
of 6,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,628
of 409,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#22
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 93.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.