You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hepatitis B virus X protein reduces the stability of Nrdp1 to up-regulate ErbB3 in hepatocellular carcinoma cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tumor Biology, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13277-016-4936-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kuan Cao, Hui Gong, Zhichao Qiu, Quan Wen, Bin Zhang, Tianjin Tang, Xinyu Zhou, Tong Cao, Bin Wang, Hengliang Shi, Renhao Wang |
| Abstract |
Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most widespread type of liver cancer. However, the underlying mechanism of HCC tumorigenesis is very intricate and HBV-encoded X protein (HBx) has been reported to play a key role in this process. It has been reported that HBx up-regulates the transcription of ErbB3. However, it remains unclear whether HBx can regulate ErbB3 expression at post-translational modification level. In this study, we showed that HBx interacts with ubiquitin ligase Nrdp1 (neuregulin receptor degradation protein 1) and decreases its stability, which results in the up-regulation of ErbB3 and promotion of HCC cells. Moreover, the expression of ErbB3 was almost undetectable in normal liver tissues but was relative abundant in HCC tissues, and the level of ErbB3 and Nrdp1 significantly showed a negative correlation in HCC tissues. Taken together, these findings suggest that HBx promotes the progression of HCC by decreasing the stability of Nrdp1, which results in up-regulation of ErbB3, suggesting that ErbB3 may be a target for HCC therapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 14% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,305,223
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,834
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#333,862
of 397,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#133
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.