↓ Skip to main content

Long-term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in super-elderly patients

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in super-elderly patients
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00464-016-4751-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshikazu Yoshifuku, Shiro Oka, Shinji Tanaka, Yoji Sanomura, Tomohiro Miwata, Norifumi Numata, Toru Hiyama, Kazuaki Chayama

Abstract

No previous study has confirmed the safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) in the super-elderly patient population. The current study aimed to evaluate the validity of ESD for EGC in super-elderly patients aged ≥85 years with comorbidities. Our study group included 85 super-elderly patients (102 EGCs) who were diagnosed at Hiroshima University Hospital between April 2002 and October 2014. We evaluated the en bloc resection rates, R0 resection rates, complication rates, and prognosis in relation to the degree of comorbidities (group A-H, patients with high-risk comorbidities; group A-L, patients with low-risk comorbidities; group B, patients without comorbidities; and group C, patients followed without ESD). The en bloc resection rates were 100, 96, and 100 % in groups A-H, A-L, and B, respectively. R0 resection rates were 94, 96, and 94 % in groups A-H, A-L, and B, respectively. There were no severe complications related to ESD. During the follow-up period, there was a significantly higher frequency of death in group A than in group B (p < 0.01), and there were no significant differences between groups A-H and A-L. However, there were no cases of death related to gastric cancer. ESD was performed safely, and death related to gastric cancer was prevented in super-elderly patients with comorbidities, regardless of the degree of the disease. However, patients with comorbidities are at a high risk of poor prognosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 7 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 54%
Psychology 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Philosophy 1 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2016.
All research outputs
#18,438,457
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#4,759
of 6,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,678
of 397,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#75
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,040 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.