↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Non-HDL Cholesterol in Risk Stratification for Coronary Artery Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Current Atherosclerosis Reports, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of Non-HDL Cholesterol in Risk Stratification for Coronary Artery Disease
Published in
Current Atherosclerosis Reports, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11883-011-0224-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jamal S. Rana, S. Matthijs Boekholdt, John J. P. Kastelein, Prediman K. Shah

Abstract

Despite aggressive lipid-lowering therapy, patients continue to be at significant risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Assessment of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) provides a measure of cholesterol contained in all atherogenic particles. In the third Adult Treatment Panel (ATP III) guidelines of the US National Cholesterol Education Program, non-HDL-C was introduced as a secondary target of therapy in persons with triglycerides ≥200 mg/dL. A recent meta-analysis of the relationship between non-HDL-C reduction and CHD risk showed non-HDL-C as an important target of therapy for CHD prevention. Most lipid-modifying drugs used as monotherapy have a 1:1 relationship between percent non-HDL-C lowering and percent CHD reduction. In the EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study, 21,448 participants without diabetes or CHD between 45 and 79 years of age were followed for 11.0 years. Participants with high non-HDL-C levels were at increased CHD risk independently of their LDL-C levels. Also, compared to apolipoprotein B, non-HDL-C appears to be a better choice given the fact that no additional tests or costs are needed and established cut points are already available. Future guidelines should emphasize the importance of non-HDL-C for guiding cardiovascular prevention strategies with an increased need to have non-HDL-C reported on routine lipid panels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 77 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Other 7 9%
Other 20 24%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 17 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,059,927
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#166
of 763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,333
of 243,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.