You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Small ad hoc versus large general training populations for genomewide selection in maize biparental crosses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00122-018-3222-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sofía P. Brandariz, Rex Bernardo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Turkey | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 13 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 42% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 36% |
| Researcher | 10 | 19% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 68% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,419,828
of 24,257,370 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#185
of 3,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,434
of 355,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#16
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,257,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.