You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reliability and comparison of gain values with occurrence of saccades in the EyeSeeCam video head impulse test (vHIT)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00405-016-4183-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leise Elisabeth Hviid Korsager, Jesper Hvass Schmidt, Christian Faber, Jens Højberg Wanscher |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 23% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 12% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,835,643
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#276
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,269
of 352,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#9
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.