↓ Skip to main content

The synthesis of jaceidin

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, February 1968
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The synthesis of jaceidin
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, February 1968
DOI 10.1007/bf02146923
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Fukui, T. Matsumoto, S. Nakamura, M. Nakayama, T. Horie

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#2,146
of 5,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,318
of 13,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.