Title |
Does species diversity limit productivity in natural grassland communities?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecology Letters, June 2007
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01058.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
James B. Grace, T. Michael Anderson, Melinda D. Smith, Eric Seabloom, Sandy J. Andelman, Gayna Meche, Evan Weiher, Larry K. Allain, Heli Jutila, Mahesh Sankaran, Johannes Knops, Mark Ritchie, Michael R. Willig |
Abstract |
Theoretical analyses and experimental studies of synthesized assemblages indicate that under particular circumstances species diversity can enhance community productivity through niche complementarity. It remains unclear whether this process has important effects in mature natural ecosystems where competitive feedbacks and complex environmental influences affect diversity-productivity relationships. In this study, we evaluated diversity-productivity relationships while statistically controlling for environmental influences in 12 natural grassland ecosystems. Because diversity-productivity relationships are conspicuously nonlinear, we developed a nonlinear structural equation modeling (SEM) methodology to separate the effects of diversity on productivity from the effects of productivity on diversity. Meta-analysis was used to summarize the SEM findings across studies. While competitive effects were readily detected, enhancement of production by diversity was not. These results suggest that the influence of small-scale diversity on productivity in mature natural systems is a weak force, both in absolute terms and relative to the effects of other controls on productivity. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 20 | 3% |
Canada | 7 | 1% |
Brazil | 7 | 1% |
Argentina | 6 | 1% |
Germany | 6 | 1% |
India | 3 | <1% |
Spain | 3 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
Other | 12 | 2% |
Unknown | 524 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 151 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 118 | 20% |
Student > Master | 70 | 12% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 46 | 8% |
Professor | 41 | 7% |
Other | 111 | 19% |
Unknown | 55 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 290 | 49% |
Environmental Science | 165 | 28% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 3% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | <1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | <1% |
Other | 23 | 4% |
Unknown | 87 | 15% |