You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Big course small talk: twitter and MOOCs — a systematic review of research designs 2011–2017
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s41239-018-0127-9 |
Authors |
Eamon Costello, Mark Brown, Mairéad Nic Giolla Mhichíl, Jingjing Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 7 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
Ireland | 3 | 11% |
France | 2 | 7% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Mexico | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
South Africa | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 50% |
Scientists | 10 | 36% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 11% |
Lecturer | 5 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 24% |
Unknown | 16 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 13 | 24% |
Computer Science | 10 | 19% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Psychology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 21 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,462,166
of 25,843,331 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#80
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,480
of 448,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,843,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.