You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence‐Based Choice of Esophageal Stent for the Palliative Management of Malignant Dysphagia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-008-9654-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danny Yakoub, Ramy Fahmy, Thanos Athanasiou, Afshin Alijani, Christopher Rao, Ara Darzi, George B. Hanna |
| Abstract |
The type of stent used for the management of patients with malignant dysphagia is chosen according to subjective physician's preference. There is no recent study available to provide updated evidence on early outcomes related to the use of different types of stents. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 22% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,377,613
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,217
of 4,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,125
of 81,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.