You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Classifying and Predicting Errors of Inpatient Medication Reconciliation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, June 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-008-0687-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer R. Pippins, Tejal K. Gandhi, Claus Hamann, Chima D. Ndumele, Stephanie A. Labonville, Ellen K. Diedrichsen, Marcy G. Carty, Andrew S. Karson, Ishir Bhan, Christopher M. Coley, Catherine L. Liang, Alexander Turchin, Patricia C. McCarthy, Jeffrey L. Schnipper |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Argentina | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 288 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 12% |
| Researcher | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 9% |
| Other | 58 | 19% |
| Unknown | 56 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 32% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 77 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Unknown | 69 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2015.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,473
of 8,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,503
of 99,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#47
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.