You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Insulin gene mutations as a cause of permanent neonatal diabetes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2007
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.0707291104 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julie Støy, Emma L. Edghill, Sarah E. Flanagan, Honggang Ye, Veronica P. Paz, Anna Pluzhnikov, Jennifer E. Below, M. Geoffrey Hayes, Nancy J. Cox, Gregory M. Lipkind, Rebecca B. Lipton, Siri Atma W. Greeley, Ann-Marie Patch, Sian Ellard, Donald F. Steiner, Andrew T. Hattersley, Louis H. Philipson, Graeme I. Bell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Slovakia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 224 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 36 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 15% |
Researcher | 34 | 15% |
Student > Master | 16 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 6% |
Other | 43 | 19% |
Unknown | 56 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 57 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 16% |
Chemistry | 9 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 7% |
Unknown | 63 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,101,030
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#34,084
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,123
of 86,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#144
of 544 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 544 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.