↓ Skip to main content

A Systematic Review of the Safety of Kava Extract in the Treatment of Anxiety

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Safety, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Systematic Review of the Safety of Kava Extract in the Treatment of Anxiety
Published in
Drug Safety, November 2012
DOI 10.2165/00002018-200225040-00003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clare Stevinson, Alyson Huntley, Edzard Ernst

Abstract

This paper systematically reviews the clinical evidence relating to the safety of extracts of the herbal anxiolytic kava (Piper methysticum). Literature searches were conducted in four electronic databases and the reference lists of all papers located were checked for further relevant publications. Information was also sought from the spontaneous reporting schemes of the WHO and national drug safety bodies and ten manufacturers of kava preparations were contacted. Data from short-term post-marketing surveillance studies and clinical trials suggest that adverse events are, in general, rare, mild and reversible. However, published case reports indicate that serious adverse events are possible including dermatological reactions, neurological complications and, of greatest concern, liver damage. Spontaneous reporting schemes also suggest that the most common adverse events are mild, but that serious ones occur. Controlled trials suggest that kava extracts do not impair cognitive performance and vigilance or potentiate the effects of central nervous system depressants. However, a possible interaction with benzodiazepines has been reported. It is concluded that when taken as a short-term monotherapy at recommended doses, kava extracts appear to be well tolerated by most users. Serious adverse events have been reported and further research is required to determine the nature and frequency of such events.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Researcher 4 5%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 22 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 27 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Drug Safety
#916
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,152
of 285,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Safety
#379
of 812 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 812 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.