You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An acute dose of inorganic dietary nitrate does not improve high-intensity, intermittent exercise performance in temperate or hot and humid conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-018-04063-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kieran Smith, David J. Muggeridge, Chris Easton, Mark D. Ross |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 47% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Greece | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 33 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 41 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,141,901
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,151
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,706
of 446,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#15
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.