↓ Skip to main content

Unexpected Intraoperative Findings, Situations, and Complications in Bariatric Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unexpected Intraoperative Findings, Situations, and Complications in Bariatric Surgery
Published in
Obesity Surgery, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11695-018-03672-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Joo, Lizbeth Guilbert, Elisa M. Sepúlveda, Cristian J. Ortíz, Gianluca Donatini, Carlos Zerrweck

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 17%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 40%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Unknown 15 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2019.
All research outputs
#20,549,510
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#3,047
of 3,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#371,533
of 437,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#57
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.