↓ Skip to main content

Algorithms for the matrix pth root

Overview of attention for article published in Numerical Algorithms, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 152)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Algorithms for the matrix pth root
Published in
Numerical Algorithms, August 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11075-004-6709-8
Authors

Dario A. Bini, Nicholas J. Higham, Beatrice Meini

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Pakistan 1 3%
Norway 1 3%
Morocco 1 3%
Mexico 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 25 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Researcher 6 19%
Professor 5 16%
Other 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 10 32%
Physics and Astronomy 5 16%
Computer Science 4 13%
Engineering 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,472,296
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Numerical Algorithms
#20
of 152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,144
of 57,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Numerical Algorithms
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 152 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them