You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The “long” runout rock avalanche in Pusa, China, on August 28, 2017: a preliminary report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landslides, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10346-018-1084-z |
| Authors |
Xuanmei Fan, Qiang Xu, Gianvito Scaringi, Guang Zheng, Runqiu Huang, Lanxin Dai, Yuanzhen Ju |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 22% |
| Engineering | 8 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,582,522
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Landslides
#218
of 530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,956
of 350,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landslides
#13
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.