You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Host and microbiome multi-omics integration: applications and methodologies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biophysical Reviews, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12551-018-0491-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qing Wang, Kaicen Wang, Wenrui Wu, Eleni Giannoulatou, Joshua W. K. Ho, Lanjuan Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 229 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 18% |
| Researcher | 39 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 14% |
| Unknown | 58 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 64 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 12% |
| Unknown | 63 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,758,831
of 24,093,053 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#181
of 839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,649
of 445,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,093,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 839 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.