You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Regional income inequality in France 1860–1954: Methods and findings
|
---|---|
Published in |
Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1080/01615440.2018.1541429 |
Authors |
Alfonso Díez-Minguela, M. Teresa Sanchis Llopis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 30% |
Researcher | 2 | 20% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 50% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2019.
All research outputs
#16,588,625
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
#149
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,070
of 445,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.