↓ Skip to main content

Use of simulation-based statistical models to complement bioclimatic models in predicting continental scale invasion risks

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of simulation-based statistical models to complement bioclimatic models in predicting continental scale invasion risks
Published in
Biological Invasions, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10530-018-1864-3
Authors

Ranjan Muthukrishnan, Nicholas R. Jordan, Adam S. Davis, James D. Forester

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 33%
Environmental Science 7 23%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 7%
Computer Science 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2019.
All research outputs
#14,436,464
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,746
of 2,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,154
of 349,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#40
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.