↓ Skip to main content

Cannabis Use: Neurobiological, Behavioral, and Sex/Gender Considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 185)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cannabis Use: Neurobiological, Behavioral, and Sex/Gender Considerations
Published in
Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40473-018-0167-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anahita Bassir Nia, Claire Mann, Harsimar Kaur, Mohini Ranganathan

Abstract

To summarize the current literature on the effects of cannabinoids in humans and to discuss the existing literature on the sex- and gender-related differences in the effects of cannabinoids. Cannabis and its constituent cannabinoids are associated with risk of addiction, cognitive deficits and mood/psychotic disorders. Preclinical and emerging clinical data suggest greater sensitivity to the effects of cannabinoids in women. Cannabis is one of the most commonly used drugs with increasing rates of use. Women in particular may be at a greater risk of adverse outcomes given the previously described "telescoping effect" of substance use in women. Human data examining the sex- and gender-related differences in the effects of cannabinoids and factors underlying these differences are very limited. This represents a critical gap in the literature and needs to be systematically examined in future studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 16%
Neuroscience 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 15 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,136,510
of 25,389,532 outputs
Outputs from Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports
#26
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,160
of 358,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,532 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.