↓ Skip to main content

Urinary hydroxypyrene determination for biomonitoring of firefighters deployed at the Fort McMurray wildfire: an inter-laboratory method comparison

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Urinary hydroxypyrene determination for biomonitoring of firefighters deployed at the Fort McMurray wildfire: an inter-laboratory method comparison
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00216-018-01569-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Biban Gill, Alicia Mell, Meera Shanmuganathan, Karl Jobst, Xu Zhang, David Kinniburgh, Nicola Cherry, Philip Britz-McKibbin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 20 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 16%
Environmental Science 5 12%
Engineering 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 21 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2019.
All research outputs
#14,920,631
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#4,456
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,662
of 446,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#39
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.