You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nutritional Risk by Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), but not Anthropometric Measurements, has a Good Discriminatory Power for Identifying Frailty in Elderly People: Data from Brazilian Secondary Care Clinic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12603-018-1128-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mariana Staut Zukeran, R.M. Ritti-Dias, F.G.M. Franco, M.S. Cendoroglo, L.D.N. de Matos, S.M. Lima Ribeiro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Brazil | 2 | 13% |
| Denmark | 1 | 6% |
| Peru | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,701,371
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#596
of 1,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,457
of 449,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#22
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.