You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction to: Toward Automatic Detection of Radiation-Induced Cerebral Microbleeds Using a 3D Deep Residual Network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Digital Imaging, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10278-018-0166-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yicheng Chen, Javier E. Villanueva-Meyer, Melanie A. Morrison, Janine M. Lupo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 28% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Singapore | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 83% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,619,665
of 24,990,015 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Digital Imaging
#108
of 1,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,365
of 451,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Digital Imaging
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,990,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.