You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction to: Use of Expert Judgement Across NICE Guidance‑Making Programmes: A Review of Current Processes and Suitability of Existing Tools to Support the Use of Expert Elicitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40258-019-00463-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alison Peel, Michelle Jenks, Moni Choudhury, Rosemary Lovett, Juan Carlos Rejon‑Parrilla, Andrew Sims, Joyce Craig |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 1 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#15,560,927
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#557
of 787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,558
of 447,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.