You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Endoscopic vacuum assisted wound closure (EVAC) device to treat esophageal and gastric leaks: assessing time to proficiency and cost
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-019-06685-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marc A. Ward, Tareq Hassan, James S. Burdick, Steven G. Leeds |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 31% |
| Spain | 2 | 15% |
| Colombia | 1 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Sweden | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 38% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 46% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,044,386
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#592
of 6,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,015
of 445,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#21
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.