↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Different Non-destructive Testing Methods to Detect Imperfections in Unidirectional Carbon Fiber Composite Ropes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 252)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of Different Non-destructive Testing Methods to Detect Imperfections in Unidirectional Carbon Fiber Composite Ropes
Published in
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10921-019-0564-y
Authors

Kim-Niklas Antin, Miguel A. Machado, Telmo G. Santos, Pedro Vilaça

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Master 7 11%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 28 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 22 34%
Materials Science 9 14%
Unspecified 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 28 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,089,388
of 24,865,967 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation
#13
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,360
of 458,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,865,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.