You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is rate of return pricing a useful approach when value-based pricing is not appropriate?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10198-019-01032-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Drummond, Adrian Towse |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| Australia | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 13% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,796,608
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#154
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,621
of 474,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#7
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.