↓ Skip to main content

An integrated review of interventions to improve psychological outcomes in caregivers of patients with heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An integrated review of interventions to improve psychological outcomes in caregivers of patients with heart failure
Published in
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care, March 2016
DOI 10.1097/spc.0000000000000182
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorraine S. Evangelista, Anna Strömberg, J. Nicholas Dionne-Odom

Abstract

This article examines interventions aimed at improving psychological outcomes (e.g., caregiver burden, quality of life, anxiety, depression, perceived control, stress mastery, caregiver confidence and preparedness, and caregiver mastery) in family caregivers of patients with heart failure. Eight studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the review. The most common intervention involved psychoeducation facilitated by a nurse (6/8) and supplemented with a combination of follow-up face-to-face sessions (2/6), home visits (2/6), telephone calls (3/6), and telemonitoring (3/6). Two studies used a support group intervention of four to six sessions. Half of the interventions reported a significant effect on one or more primary outcomes, including caregiver burden (n = 4), depressive symptoms (n = 1), stress mastery (n = 1), caregiver confidence and preparedness (n = 1), and caregiver mastery (n = 1). Compared with dementia and cancer family caregiving, few interventions have been evaluated in caregivers of patients with heart failure. Of the existing interventions identified in this review, considerable variability was observed in aims, intervention content, delivery methods, duration, intensity, methodological rigor, outcomes, and effects. Given this current state of the science, direct comparison of heart failure caregiver interventions and recommendations for clinical practice are premature. Thus, research priority is strongly warranted for intervention development and testing to enhance heart failure caregiver support and education.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 169 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 18%
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Master 23 13%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 3%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 47 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 53 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 16%
Psychology 16 9%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 54 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2017.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care
#346
of 677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,485
of 312,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 677 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.