↓ Skip to main content

The transtheoretical model of behavior change: a meta-analysis of applications to physical activity and exercise

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, November 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
497 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
708 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The transtheoretical model of behavior change: a meta-analysis of applications to physical activity and exercise
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, November 2001
DOI 10.1207/s15324796abm2304_2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon J. Marshall, Stuart J. H. Biddle

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to summarize findings from empirical applications of the transtheoretical model (TTM) (Prochaska & DiClemente, 1983) in the physical activity domain by using the quantitative method of meta-analysis. Ninety-one independent samples from 71 published reports were located that present empirical data on at least one core construct of the TTM applied to exercise and physical activity. In general, results support the application because core constructs differ across stages and most changes are in the direction predicted by the theory. Three general conclusions are offered. First, existing data are unable to confirm whether physical activity behavior change occurs in a series ofstages that are qualitatively different or along adjacent segments of an underlying continuum. Second, the growing number of studies that incorporate TTM concepts means that there is an increasing need to standardize and improve the reliability of measurement. Finally, the role ofprocesses of change needs reexamining because the higher order constructs are not apparent in the physical activity domain and stage-by-process interactions are not evident. There now are sufficient data to confirm that stage membership is associated with different levels of physical activity, self-efficacy, pros and cons, and processes of change. Further studies that simply stage participants or examine cross-sectional differences between core constructs of the TTM are of limited use. Future research should examine the moderators and mediators of stage transition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 708 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 2%
United Kingdom 8 1%
Australia 3 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 666 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 146 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 116 16%
Student > Bachelor 98 14%
Researcher 64 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 54 8%
Other 118 17%
Unknown 112 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 148 21%
Sports and Recreations 103 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 78 11%
Social Sciences 75 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 6%
Other 120 17%
Unknown 144 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,728,845
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#300
of 1,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,667
of 47,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them