You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fragility of Traditions: The Disturbance Hypothesis for the Loss of Local Traditions in Orangutans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Primatology, June 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1014965516127 |
| Authors |
Carel P. van Schaik |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 92 | 55% |
| Environmental Science | 24 | 14% |
| Psychology | 10 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 25 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#662,732
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Primatology
#24
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#482
of 126,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Primatology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them