You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Frequency and power of human alpha oscillations drift systematically with time-on-task
|
---|---|
Published in |
NeuroImage, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.067 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christopher S.Y. Benwell, Raquel E. London, Chiara F. Tagliabue, Domenica Veniero, Joachim Gross, Christian Keitel, Gregor Thut |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 10 | 28% |
United States | 5 | 14% |
Belgium | 2 | 6% |
Germany | 2 | 6% |
Australia | 2 | 6% |
Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 61% |
Scientists | 12 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 209 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 19% |
Student > Master | 39 | 19% |
Researcher | 32 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 5% |
Other | 28 | 13% |
Unknown | 45 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 56 | 27% |
Psychology | 38 | 18% |
Engineering | 13 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 7% |
Unknown | 70 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,882,199
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#1,356
of 12,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,376
of 368,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#30
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.