You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
“You Social Scientists Love Mind Games”: Experimenting in the “divide” between data science and critical algorithm studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Big Data & Society, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1177/2053951719833404 |
| Authors |
David Moats, Nick Seaver |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 13% |
| Canada | 5 | 8% |
| Germany | 3 | 5% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Antarctica | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 50% |
| Scientists | 21 | 34% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 16% |
| Researcher | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 39 | 36% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 37 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2022.
All research outputs
#758,984
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Big Data & Society
#117
of 696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,498
of 367,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Big Data & Society
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.