↓ Skip to main content

Clinical protein science in translational medicine targeting malignant melanoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Biology and Toxicology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 486)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical protein science in translational medicine targeting malignant melanoma
Published in
Cell Biology and Toxicology, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10565-019-09468-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeovanis Gil, Lazaro Hiram Betancourt, Indira Pla, Aniel Sanchez, Roger Appelqvist, Tasso Miliotis, Magdalena Kuras, Henriette Oskolas, Yonghyo Kim, Zsolt Horvath, Jonatan Eriksson, Ethan Berge, Elisabeth Burestedt, Göran Jönsson, Bo Baldetorp, Christian Ingvar, Håkan Olsson, Lotta Lundgren, Peter Horvatovich, Jimmy Rodriguez Murillo, Yutaka Sugihara, Charlotte Welinder, Elisabet Wieslander, Boram Lee, Henrik Lindberg, Krzysztof Pawłowski, Ho Jeong Kwon, Viktoria Doma, Jozsef Timar, Sarolta Karpati, A. Marcell Szasz, István Balázs Németh, Toshihide Nishimura, Garry Corthals, Melinda Rezeli, Beatrice Knudsen, Johan Malm, György Marko-Varga

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 29 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Computer Science 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 39 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,600,039
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Cell Biology and Toxicology
#47
of 486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,297
of 351,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Biology and Toxicology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 486 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.