You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
SSR-based genetic maps of Miscanthus sinensis and M. sacchariflorus, and their comparison to sorghum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00122-012-1790-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Changsoo Kim, Dong Zhang, Susan A. Auckland, Lisa K. Rainville, Katrin Jakob, Brent Kronmiller, Erik J. Sacks, Martin Deuter, Andrew H. Paterson |
| Abstract |
We present SSR-based genetic maps from a cross between Miscanthus sacchariflorus Robustus and M. sinensis, the progenitors of the promising cellulosic biofuel feedstock Miscanthus × giganteus. cDNA-derived SSR markers were mapped by the two-way pseudo-testcross model due to the high heterozygosity of each parental species. A total of 261 loci were mapped in M. sacchariflorus, spanning 40 linkage groups and 1,998.8 cM, covering an estimated 72.7% of the genome. For M. sinensis, a total of 303 loci were mapped, forming 23 linkage groups and 2,238.3 cM, covering 84.9% of the genome. The use of cDNA-derived SSR loci permitted alignment of the Miscanthus linkage groups to the sorghum chromosomes, revealing a whole genome duplication affecting the Miscanthus lineage after the divergence of subtribes Sorghinae and Saccharinae, as well as traces of the pan-cereal whole genome duplication. While the present maps provide for many early research needs in this emerging crop, additional markers are also needed to improve map density and to further characterize the structural changes of the Miscanthus genome since its divergence from sorghum and Saccharum. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 40% |
| Researcher | 13 | 21% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
| Professor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 70% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2012.
All research outputs
#16,031,680
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#2,892
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,999
of 250,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#13
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.