↓ Skip to main content

Tumor Prevention by 9-Cis-Retinoic Acid in the N-Nitroso-N-Methylurea Model of Mammary Carcinogenesis is Potentiated by the Pineal Hormone Melatonin

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, March 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tumor Prevention by 9-Cis-Retinoic Acid in the N-Nitroso-N-Methylurea Model of Mammary Carcinogenesis is Potentiated by the Pineal Hormone Melatonin
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, March 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1014912919470
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Nowfar, S.R. Teplitzky, K. Melancon, T.L. Kiefer, Q. Cheng, P.D. Dwivedi, E.D. Bischoff, K. Moroz, M.B. Anderson, J. Dai, L. Lai, L. Yuan, S.M. Hill

Abstract

Our laboratory has demonstrated that treatment of MCF-7 breast cancer cells with melatonin (Mlt) followed 24h later with physiological concentrations of all-trans retinoic acid (atRA) results in apoptosis. These studies were extended into trials using the N-nitroso-N-methylurea (NMU)-induced rat mammary tumor model. Initial studies conducted by feeding the animals 9-cis-retinoic acid (9cRA in the chow) and administering melatonin by subcutaneous injection in the late afternoon demonstrated that the combination of Mlt and 9cRA was able to significantly prevent tumor development, and that the combination was more efficacious that either Mlt or 9cRA alone. In this report, we conducted studies to determine if lower doses of 9cRA could be used in combination with Mlt while still maintaining anti-tumor activity and if the route of administration of 9cRA (bolus (gavage) v.s. chronic (chow) routes) affected its interaction with Mlt. The studies presented here demonstrate that significantly reduced doses of 9cRA can be used in combination with Mlt while maintaining anti-tumor efficacy. Furthermore, our studies demonstrate that 9cRA is equally effective when it is administered chronically (chow) or as a bolus (gavage). These data demonstrate that the combined use of Mlt and 9cRA produces additive or synergistic effects, which are more efficacious than 9cRA alone. This combination of Mlt and 9cRA could be a potentially useful clinical treatment regimen for breast cancer since it allows the use of lower doses of retinoic acid, thus, avoiding the toxic side effects associated with the use of high dose retinoids.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 21 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Psychology 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2010.
All research outputs
#7,474,859
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,656
of 4,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,364
of 45,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.