You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Socioeconomic Status (SES) and Children's Intelligence (IQ): In a UK-Representative Sample SES Moderates the Environmental, Not Genetic, Effect on IQ
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0030320 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ken B. Hanscombe, Maciej Trzaskowski, Claire M. A. Haworth, Oliver S. P. Davis, Philip S. Dale, Robert Plomin |
Abstract |
The environment can moderate the effect of genes - a phenomenon called gene-environment (GxE) interaction. Several studies have found that socioeconomic status (SES) modifies the heritability of children's intelligence. Among low-SES families, genetic factors have been reported to explain less of the variance in intelligence; the reverse is found for high-SES families. The evidence however is inconsistent. Other studies have reported an effect in the opposite direction (higher heritability in lower SES), or no moderation of the genetic effect on intelligence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 16% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 11% |
Belgium | 2 | 4% |
Norway | 2 | 4% |
Spain | 2 | 4% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
El Salvador | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 28 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 45 | 82% |
Scientists | 5 | 9% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 377 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
United States | 4 | 1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 361 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 56 | 15% |
Researcher | 52 | 14% |
Student > Master | 46 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 7% |
Other | 65 | 17% |
Unknown | 69 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 128 | 34% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 28 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 18 | 5% |
Other | 58 | 15% |
Unknown | 90 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#730,697
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#9,716
of 224,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,135
of 255,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#109
of 3,346 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,346 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.