You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Chinese Herbal Medicine for Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Montreal Cognitive Assessment: A Systematic Review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1089/acm.2018.0346 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lin Dong, Anna J. Hyde, Anthony Lin Zhang, Charlie Changli Xue, Brian H. May |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Researcher | 5 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 30 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
Psychology | 3 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 31 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,838,109
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine
#979
of 2,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,641
of 364,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine
#22
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.