You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
From well-being to positive mental health: conceptualization and qualitative development of an instrument in Singapore
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quality of Life Research, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11136-011-0105-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janhavi Ajit Vaingankar, Mythily Subramaiam, Yee Wei Lim, Cathy Sherbourne, Nan Luo, Gery Ryan, Amy Phua, Shazana Shahwan, Kian Woon Kwok, Julie Brown, Melissa Bradley, Maria Orlando Edelen, Siow Ann Chong |
| Abstract |
There is no global definition of well-being. Cultural differences in the perception of well-being and the social and behavioral contexts further limit its measurement. Existing instruments are developed in Western societies that differ in their conceptualization of well-being from Asian populations. Moreover, very few instruments address the multidimensional construct of well-being. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 24% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 24 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2012.
All research outputs
#17,655,049
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#1,884
of 2,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,534
of 246,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#13
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,839 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.