↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in five staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leak rates in five staple-line reinforcement options: a systematic review
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00464-019-06782-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michel Gagner, Paul Kemmeter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 14%
Other 8 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 28 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 49%
Chemistry 3 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 36 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2022.
All research outputs
#12,964,987
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,611
of 6,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,424
of 318,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#35
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,057 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.